Understanding the fitness and regeneration state of the athletes and controlling them correctly to develop them optimally

Sports scientists have a number of surveillance and quantification instruments to To assess the extent and intensity of the load of an athlete. In addition, the reactions to this stress, as well as the objective and subjective status of the physical fitness or the fatigue of the athlete can be assessed (Gabbett et al, 2017).

The Knowledge of the status of the athlete before the start of a training unit or a training cycle is suitable for adequate training and load control essential.

The load shall be: Customized individual needs of players to be. This presupposes that the trainer knows about the fitness condition, the regeneration status and the likelihood of injury of an athlete. Without information – whether subjective (sallow stone estimation on questions) or objective (measurements with sensors, blood collection etc.) – the trainer can only guess. And as we all know, rats don't know. Without data so the trainer can load and thus the Do not properly control training.

The result: bad fitness and many injuries

The knowledge of the conditional performance of each athlete at certain times of the season and the physical and mental constitution before the training or the competition are therefore fundamental for the success of a teamto avoid increased fatigue or overtraining.

Evaluation of physical performance

The goal is to continuous information to obtain the effects of the exercise and the physical and technical condition of the athlete. One of the requirements for control is data that shows the effects of training.

Basically, the trainer must know what the player has done and how he has responded to this burden (Borresen & Lambert, 2009).

This gives the trainer information about Long-term effects training to investigate or evaluate the extent to which the training goals have been achieved and to what extent they match the physical condition of the athlete.

In addition, if the stimuli received by the players are compared with the results of the physical tests of the different abilities (fastness, endurance and acceleration, with general or specific requirements of the game), you will get a more accurate assessment of how the physical performance developed during the season has.

In this sense, we try to establish a relationship between the stimulus (activity) and the effect (positive or negative adjustments), always with the aim of generating knowledge and thus the Training more effective.

Starling & Lambert (2017) asked trainers how important the load monitoring is for their training.

Whole 67 % the respondents consider monitoring the training load as “very important”, 29 % the respondents stated that the monitoring was “important”. This study teaches which Value of load monitoring in team sports already.

This trend will continue in the next few years. More and more trainers and experts – also in the amateur sector – will become the The importance of adequate training and load control consciously to gain a competitive advantage over other teams.

Better physical performance and at the same time fewer injuries inevitably lead to better cutting in the league.

To collect data from players, we recommend that Team Management System (TMS). With this software you can quickly and easily – and especially automated – collect, evaluate and analyze data from players.

Join today for free! Click here!



You want to learn more about the Team Management System (TMS)? Here you can find more information:

What is the TMS anyway and how does it work?

Charge data?

Here you can find out more:

Rate of perceived exertion (RPE) – a simple and effective method for controlling loads in football

Literature

Borresen, J. & Lambert, M. (2008). Quantifying training load: a comparison of subjective and objective methods. International Journal of Sports and Performance, 3(1), 16-30.

Gabbett, T. J., Nassis, G. P., Oetter, E., Pretorius, J., Johnston, N., Medina, D., Rodas, G., Myslinski, T., Howells, D., Beard, A. y Ryan, A. (2017). The athlete monitoring cycle: a practical guide to interpreting and applying training monitoring data. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 51(20), 1451-1452.

Starling, L. T. & Lambert, M. I. (2017). Monitoring Rugby Players for Fitness and Fatigue: What Do Coaches Want? International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance. 15, 1-30. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2017-0416.